Don't fear the REAPER

Posted by aeron on March 7, 2013, 1:16 a.m.

Those of you familiar with REAPER are probably aware it subscribes heavily to the notion "there's more than one way to skin a cat". This is sometimes a source of frustration for new users who are overwhelmed by all the menu items and endless customization. But I think once you realize you have the power to tailor the entire workspace to your needs it gets a lot harder to go back to other DAWs.

I never cease to discover new features and alternative workflows, which certainly makes this one of my favorite programs to explore and tweak. Recently I started taking advantage of REAPER's routing to send multiple MIDI channels on one track to various instruments on other tracks. Each channel corresponds to an instrument, so instead of having separate MIDI clips on each track (which have to be edited in separate windows), I can just create one MIDI clip and work with the entire harmonization/voicing in it's own window:

(Click to see example routing. Really quite simple, just change the MIDI channel to your liking)

REAPER's MIDI editor is rather underrated, in my opinion. It's filtering and display settings are second to none, like the rest of the program it's really easy to fit it to your needs. For example, you can use the dropdown in the top right corner to enable the channel filter and work on one channel at a time, or click the filter button for more fine-grain control. The color dropdown in the bottom right allows you to color by channel to more easily distinguish voices.

Anywhoo, this is just a blurg of a blog. If none of this concerns you, laugh it off jovially, go do that voodoo that you do, and proceed to move along citizen.

Comments

bendodge 11 years, 2 months ago

ProTools's MIDI editor is a bit frustrating. Perhaps I should export, edit in REAPER, and then trundle it back over to ProTools.

JuurianChi 11 years, 2 months ago

I haven't given Reason a serious look yet.

It's just sitting there looking cute, and when I open it up for fun I go "Oh you!" -

and then close it.

JuurianChi 11 years, 2 months ago

Quote:
To me, that's like deciding to buy a new car because you lost the keys to your old one :(.

Well I've been working with Beta versions for the past year so I was kinda just getting tired of bugs.

A quick fix until the official build came out is what I wanted.

colseed 11 years, 2 months ago

how did i know this would be about the DAW when i saw the blog title…? -.o

Only heard about REAPER last week, and I've been looking a while for a decent program to use for music making that can take soundfonts and won't cost me multiple organs, so I'll have to try it sometime.

aeron 11 years, 2 months ago

Quote:
Back in the days when this feature didn't exist, this is the reason I quit using piano roll editors and just learned how to write directly on to sheet music instead, using Sibelius.

The use of sheet music also makes the workflow extremely efficient when you're writing diatonic music (like most of us do). Might be worth exploring if you're seeking further efficiency. Sibelius will also automatically add some humanization to your music so that it feels less "computerized". You can choose from a variety of playing styles and intensities. You can easily connect Sibelius to REAPER using something like loopMIDI.

That's one feature I always secretly hope makes it into REAPER some day (score view). For me the reason for not switching to another editor was latency (Mind you the other editor at the time was Finale), since I'm pretty reliant on my midi keyboard to work with sheet music. And it's just hard to beat DAWs which were designed for low latency.

That said I still want to give Sibelius a shot, since I'm in need of a better score writing program. If I can't get it to operate with low latency then fuck my comfort zone haha, I'll stick with it anyway, so long as it's more stable than Finale.

Quote:
Also on the subject of REAPER, I'd strongly urge everyone to ignore the "professionals" who say that "REAPER is crap because it's free. Get something expensive like Cubase or Pro Tools if you want professional results". The majority of people who say that have likely never even used REAPER and don't know what they're talking about. In my experience, in some cases it's more capable than a $700 DAW.

These people don't realize who it is actually developing REAPER. The head of Cockos is the man who brought us Winamp. He is already set for life and doesn't need to make a killing off REAPER, he does it because he loves having a pet project. Hence the low price entry point.

Quote:
ProTools's MIDI editor is a bit frustrating. Perhaps I should export, edit in REAPER, and then trundle it back over to ProTools.
You could always try ReWire. My attempts at using REAPER and Reason together have gone very smoothly, though I'm not sure how well it's supported by ProTools.