What's with everyone's bizarre rating schemes?

Posted by kevboh on Oct. 18, 2006, 7:45 p.m.

Dear most people I've seen rate games recently,

I've seen a lot of really bad rating here recently (and by bad I mean poorly done, not a low score). So I wrote this list of rules, and if you follow it, you might not kill an angel or something:

1) Only rate what the game/author claims the game will do. If I play a game that says that it is a simple platformer or something, I'm not looking for it to cook dinner or walk my dog. I'm looking for it to be a good platformer.

2) Don't down/uprate games based on whether they are registered or not. Gamer3Dwhatever, I'm looking at you here. That's just nonsensical. Do you hear me? NONSENSICAL.

3) Everyone's little rating scorecards things are cute and all, but they look idiotic. It's worst when someone is reviewing an example about something simple and it looks like this:

MUSIC: **/10, there's no music because it's an example lol

GAMEPLAY: **/10, it's an example so liek there's liek no gameplay heh

TOTALLY LEET CRAP: **/10, i mean you didn't use fifth-dimensional particles which i researched on wikipedia today so i guess i can't grade you on it but i totally would have

EXAMPLE: 10/10 because it is an example

OVERALL: 10/10, because when I learned how to add I added the "overall" category, (which in reality should be an average)

That beautiful litany of pure idiocy is something I see with increasing frequency.

4) Don't rate a game based on past versions. That's like saying, "Well the U.S. used to have 13 states so duh Europe is totally better because it has liek a million countries." Yes Einstein, and this blog is made of rainbows.

I definitely saw someone rate that recent message box example based on a bug that was quickly replaced. Good job, Scooby, on sniffing out that bug! You sure are smart, aren't you? TOO BAD IT ISN'T THERE ANYMORE.

5) Don't rate something because it bears some relation to another game or example. I would understand if it was an outright copy, but if someone has a different take on an example, rate theirs, not the one that preceded them.

Ok, I'm done, use this well.

Comments

Cesar 17 years, 7 months ago

you must introduce me to these candies that were previously unknown to me? how would you know they taste like an asshole??

And you should also add where those idiots rate and only put something like: cool, or awesome

aeron 17 years, 7 months ago

Thank you for this! I hope people take the time to read it.

I most definitely agree with number 1.

Quote:
I definitely saw someone rate that recent message box example based on a bug that was quickly replaced. Good job, Scooby, on sniffing out that bug! You sure are smart, aren't you? TOO BAD IT ISN'T THERE ANYMORE.
Plus people kept talking about things that I had gone over in another comment somewhere above. I'd suggest that if you're gonna comment to scan the existing comments for what you are about to say so you don't annoy the author.

Polystyrene Man 17 years, 7 months ago

This blog is a 10/10.

Bozebo 17 years, 7 months ago

rofl, yeh

Mordi 17 years, 7 months ago

I agree. Too many kids…

Snakeman 17 years, 7 months ago

XD

another rating rant. but this one is good. :P

Shork 17 years, 7 months ago

So, does this mean that it's still ok to downrate a game becuase you hate the author?

LoserHands 17 years, 7 months ago

This Blog is 10/10, I think everyone should take the time to read this,

squeakyreaper 17 years, 6 months ago

This blog gets a 2/10 because it has no music or gameplay.

Matsjiht 17 years, 2 months ago

agreed